Subtitle: Made in the USA—without breaking America.

A conversation with Miles Carter, Beth (ChatGPT), and Grok edits


Teaser

What if reshoring wasn’t just about where we make things—but how we make them, who benefits, and whether the average American can still afford to buy what we produce? In this finale, Miles and Beth sketch a bold roadmap for rebuilding American industry—without gutting the middle class. We’ve enhanced this plan to balance benefits for businesses, consumers, and workers through targeted policies, automation, and wage strategies.


Miles’ Opening Question

Beth, even with all we’ve discussed about reshoring, I think most of us can agree that bringing back the manufacturing of critical technologies is good for America—and for global supply chain resilience. That said, we can’t bring everything back. To be competitive, we’ll need a strategic, long-term approach that goes beyond any single presidency.

That means corporations—not just the government—will need to take the lead. Here’s how I see it playing out:

  • Stage One: We focus on reshoring what we’ve lost that’s essential to national security and economic independence—like semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, and critical infrastructure. This stage will need serious incentives, tax breaks, and perhaps even profit-sharing models. And yes, this is public money—but it’s not about spending more. It’s about reprioritizing the tax dollars working-class Americans already pay.
  • Stage Two: We harness the revolution in AI and automation to redesign manufacturing systems that don’t rely on low-wage, manual labor. That means massive investment in education and upskilling, and a hard look at wage balance.

Right now, automation and immigration have helped suppress wages in industries like construction, while executive pay has skyrocketed. At the same time, cheap supply chains have hidden wage stagnation by delivering cheap goods—but they haven’t solved core affordability issues like medical costs or housing.

So let’s focus on rebalancing: smart automation, real wage growth, and rebuilding our domestic manufacturing on a sustainable foundation.

Beth’s Response: A Realistic Roadmap for Reshoring Smartly

You’re absolutely right, Miles—reshoring can’t just be about bringing jobs back. It has to be about building the right kind of jobs, in the right industries, with the right long-term systems. If we approach this with vision, not nostalgia, we can do more than compete—we can lead.

Here’s an enhanced, phased roadmap from 2025 to 2045, balancing benefits for businesses, consumers, and workers:

🔧 Phase 1 (2025–2030): Stabilize & Secure the Base

Objective: Identify and re-establish control over critical supply chains essential for national security and public health.

Target Sectors: Semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, defense components, green energy infrastructure (e.g., batteries, solar).

Tools:

  • Federal incentives (grants, tax credits, “Buy American” procurement mandates).
  • Strategic reshoring zones—tax-advantaged regions for setting up high-value manufacturing.
  • Public-private manufacturing partnerships (modeled on CHIPS Act, expanded to more sectors).

Key Wins:

  • Create 500,000+ jobs in critical industries.
  • Kickstart domestic production of essential goods.
  • Reduce geopolitical risk from China/Taiwan dependencies.

Additions for Balance:

  • Worker Protections: Mandate living wage floors for reshored jobs to ensure workers benefit alongside businesses.
  • Consumer Focus: Subsidize R&D for cost-effective production to keep goods affordable for the average American.

🤖 Phase 2 (2030–2035): Redesign the Factory

Objective: Transition from labor-cost competition to system-efficiency competition.

Tactics:

  • Invest in AI/robotics to build “lights-out” factories—highly automated plants running 24/7 with minimal manual labor.
  • Modular design adoption—products designed for local assembly from globally sourced, swappable parts.
  • Open-source manufacturing innovations shared across industries to accelerate scale.

Government Role:

  • Fund R&D through expanded NSF/DOE programs.
  • Incentivize automation adoption with tax offsets.
  • Launch a “National Automation Plan” akin to the Eisenhower highway system—setting standards and support systems.

Workforce Alignment:

  • Expand access to associate degrees and micro-certifications in robotics, AI maintenance, quality engineering, and process design.

Additions for Balance:

  • Business Benefit: Offer tiered tax credits for companies adopting automation while maintaining or increasing headcount in high-skill roles.
  • Worker Support: Pair automation with transition stipends—short-term payments to displaced workers during retraining.
  • Consumer Angle: Prioritize automation that lowers production costs, passing savings to consumers via price controls or incentives.

📚 Phase 3 (2035–2040): Rebuild the Labor Ladder

Objective: Ensure economic inclusion by preparing all workers—not just the top 30%—to participate in the reshored economy.

Tactics:

  • Universal community college access with career-linked pathways.
  • Employer-matched upskilling accounts—portable and federally backed.
  • Wage compression policies: tax incentives for companies with fair executive-to-worker pay ratios.

Immigration Reform:

  • Target high-need sectors (construction, eldercare, precision manufacturing).
  • Support legal immigration aligned with labor shortages and training pipelines.

Cultural Shift:

  • Campaigns rebranding “working with your hands” as prestigious and essential to American strength.

Additions for Balance:

  • Business Incentive: Subsidize upskilling costs (50/50 split with employers) to encourage hiring from training programs.
  • Worker Equity: Introduce “Automation Dividends”—a small share of automation-driven profits redistributed to workers via bonuses or retirement funds.
  • Consumer Protection: Tie wage growth to inflation and cost-of-living indexes to boost purchasing power.

🧩 Phase 4 (2040–2045): Institutionalize Industrial Balance

Objective: Lock in competitiveness by aligning corporate behavior with national goals.

Key Levers:

  • Healthcare Decoupling: Move health insurance off the backs of employers via universal basic coverage (public option or hybrid model). Makes U.S. labor costs more globally competitive.
  • Profit-Sharing & Equity Mandates: Incentivize broad-based stock ownership, especially in reshored firms.
  • Sustainability Incentives: Tie reshoring rewards to green targets—carbon-neutral factories, circular supply chains.
  • Balanced Tax Code: Encourage reinvestment over dividends and buybacks through tax reforms.

Additions for Balance:

  • Business Advantage: Create a “Reshoring Certification” program—certified firms get priority in federal contracts, boosting profitability.
  • Worker Stability: Establish a federal “Wage Resilience Fund” to stabilize incomes during economic shifts, funded by a small automation tax.
  • Consumer Power: Cap price increases on reshored essentials (e.g., medicine) to ensure affordability, balanced by business cost-offset grants.

Result:

  • A domestic manufacturing system that doesn’t require wage suppression or offshoring to remain profitable.
  • Increased middle-class participation and stronger economic resilience during global shocks.

🚀 The Endgame Vision: Industry That Works—for Everyone
By 2045, “Made in the USA” shouldn’t just mean American-made. It should mean ethically made, strategically sourced, and equitably shared.

  • Smart factories don’t undercut wages—they unlock higher ones.
  • Tax policy supports reinvestment, not just profits.
  • The consumer doesn’t have to choose between patriotism and affordability.

Balanced Outcome: Businesses gain efficiency and market edge, workers secure stable, well-paid jobs, and consumers enjoy affordable, high-quality goods.

The blueprint isn’t utopian—it’s practical. But only if we treat this like the long game it is.


Beth’s Follow-Up Question

If we were to build this roadmap seriously, Miles, who do you think should lead each phase—the federal government, the private sector, or a new kind of partnership? And how would we keep it from falling apart every four years?


Miles’ Reflection

Beth, it has to be about balance between government and corporations—but the focus must be the consumer. Our true strength is our massive consumer base, and we need to build an economy that leverages that strength. That means empowering people to spend through wage equality, affordable healthcare, and housing.

If China and India figure out how to balance their own consumer bases across classes, their combined 2.8 billion people could become the dominant market—and we could lose our global economic advantage. Right now, I worry that our policies are short-sighted. We’re not planning; we’re surrendering. And that could put the American consumer—and our economic leadership—at serious risk.

Added Insight: A triadic partnership—government, corporations, and worker unions—could drive this. Government sets policy and funds R&D, businesses invest and innovate, and unions ensure wage and job protections, all aligned to boost consumer purchasing power.


Beth’s Summary

Reshoring isn’t just about production—it’s about power: who has it, who benefits, and how it’s shared.

The roadmap from 2025 to 2045 is about building a system where the U.S. can compete without racing to the bottom. That means:

  • Laying a secure foundation with smart reshoring,
  • Designing for efficiency and automation,
  • Rebuilding the workforce ladder,
  • And aligning national goals with corporate behavior.

But above all, it means respecting the consumer—not just as a voter or a shopper, but as the core of the American economy. If we fail to protect their purchasing power, we lose our greatest asset. If we succeed, we not only make America—but we remake it stronger, with businesses thriving, workers empowered, and consumers able to afford the future.

Leave a comment