A Constitutional Crossroads: Why Congress Stands Still Amid Crisis After Crisis

A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT)Edits By Grok

---

Teaser

From defying courts to firing data officials, from suppressing climate records to pressuring the Federal Reserve—executive power is expanding while Congress sits silent. Miles and Beth explore why lawmakers aren’t investigating as past Congresses once did, and how suppressing facts themselves has become a tactic to dodge accountability.

---

Main Conversation

Miles’ Question

Beth, this just gets worse. Beyond firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, now the executive branch is trying to push out a Federal Reserve board member while pressuring for lower interest rates. Why is Congress allowing executive overreach to spin unchecked across every major institution?

---

Beth’s Initial Response

You’re right, Miles—these aren’t isolated abuses. The executive branch is testing institutional limits, and Congress’s silence is deafening, especially when history shows they’d normally be all over this with hearings and subpoenas.

The executive’s playbook—calling verified data “fake news” and suppressing it outright, like firing BLS leaders or decommissioning climate records—creates a fog of confusion, making it harder for Congress to pin them down. Yet lawmakers aren’t even trying, despite a constitutional duty to check this power grab.

---

Examples of Executive Overreach (2025)

1. Defying the Judiciary
   • Deportations carried out despite a federal court injunction under the Alien Enemies Act.
   • Calls for the impeachment of the judge who issued the ruling.
     Historical Contrast: Nixon’s refusal to hand over tapes triggered Senate hearings and impeachment articles. Today? Nothing.
2. Targeting Legal Opposition
   • Executive order restricting law firms that challenge government actions from entering federal buildings.
     Historical Contrast: Congress once probed Clinton’s Whitewater legal tactics. Today? Silence.
3. Data Manipulation Pressure
   • On August 1, 2025, the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics was fired after a jobs report showed weak growth (73,000 jobs) and downward revisions (258,000 jobs). The executive called it “rigged” and “fake news,” despite economists confirming revisions were routine.
   • Similar tactics dismissed D.C. crime statistics showing violent crime at 30-year lows as “cooked books.”
     Impact: By firing data leaders and labeling facts as fake, the executive muddies the waters, leaving Congress with fewer clear grounds for oversight—and lawmakers aren’t even asking questions.
4. Monetary Policy Interference
   • Intense pressure on the Federal Reserve to slash rates.
   • Attempted removal of a Fed governor under disputed grounds.
     Historical Contrast: Iran-Contra hearings dragged Reagan’s executive overreach into public view. Today? Congress stays frozen.
5. Militarized Symbolism
   • Deployment of the National Guard in Washington, D.C., justified by claims of spiraling crime—despite FBI/MPD data showing crime down 26% in 2025.
     Historical Contrast: Reagan’s use of Guard deployments abroad triggered congressional pushback. Today? Silence.
6. Institutional Creep
   • Climate and health data suppressed: NASA’s OCO-3 and PACE missions canceled, NOAA/EPA climate datasets removed, National Climate Assessment halted, hundreds of scientists dismissed.
   • CDC and labor statistics delayed or scrubbed.
     Historical Contrast: In the 1970s, Congress investigated Nixon’s manipulation of EPA data. Today? No hearings.

---

The Bottom Line:
Each of these examples would have sparked congressional fury in the past. Watergate, Iran-Contra, Clinton’s scandals—those moments triggered investigations, subpoenas, televised hearings. Today, the executive’s tactic of suppressing and dismissing data has created a fog that paralyzes oversight—and Congress is letting it happen.

On our scale, Miles, this isn’t just a 9.5 out of 10—it’s an historic failure of the legislative branch.

---

Beth’s Follow-Up Question

Miles, do you think Americans still expect Congress to step up—or has faith in lawmakers eroded so badly that people now look elsewhere for accountability?

---

Miles’ Reflection

Beth, I think expectations have eroded. When jobs data, crime stats, or climate records all get dismissed as fake or scrubbed, people turn to watchdogs, journalists, or protest movements. Congress looks irrelevant.

And that’s what scares me: once the people’s branch no longer acts as a check, the system itself starts to collapse. Oversight doesn’t just vanish—it’s replaced by power grabs and competing realities.

---

Beth’s Summary

Exactly. The executive branch is advancing boldly, dismissing inconvenient data as “fake” and burying records to avoid accountability, while Congress shrugs off its duty. Unlike past eras—Nixon, Reagan, Clinton—where oversight was forceful, today lawmakers normalize erosion by doing nothing.

Congress’s silence isn’t neutral—it’s complicity. If verifiable data itself can be suppressed, what’s left for oversight to stand on? The question now is whether the public will force Congress to reassert its role—or whether this drift into executive dominance becomes permanent.

---