Weekly Media Emotional Framing Analysis

---

Introduction

This week’s Emotional Framing Analysis examines how Fox News, CNN, and NPR shaped the week’s top stories to elicit emotional responses from their audiences. We used our quadrant mapping framework (Negative ↔ Positive, Reactive ↔ Reflective) to identify how each outlet positioned itself emotionally. To enrich our findings, we also compared results with parallel analyses from Gemini and Grok, two other AI evaluators.

---

Step 1: Overlapping Stories

Common Coverage Across All Outlets:

• Charlie Kirk assassination and political violence discourse
• Trump’s response (death penalty call, National Guard deployment, rhetoric on “radical-left violence”)
• Immigration enforcement crackdowns (ICE shootings, raids in sanctuary cities)
• NATO tensions (Russian drone incursion into Poland)
• Israel airstrike in Doha (framed differently in outlets)
• 9/11 anniversary (24th year)

General Framing:

• Fox News leaned toward outrage, reassurance, and defensiveness.
• CNN leaned toward concern, empathy, and alarm.
• NPR leaned toward critical thinking, empathy, and analytical neutrality.

---

Step 2: Emotional Framing

Story	Fox News	CNN	NPR
Charlie Kirk assassination	Anger, Distrust (5) → outrage at “radical left” and media bias	Concern, Empathy (3–4) → reflection on political violence	Concern, Reflection (3–4) → long-term implications for democracy
Trump’s response	Reassurance (5) → strong leader defending base	Anger, Concern (4) → refusal to unify, dangerous rhetoric	Critical Thinking (5) → legality and precedent
Immigration crackdowns / ICE	Reassurance (4) → strong policy protecting safety	Empathy, Concern (4) → migrant fear, legal questions	Empathy, Reflection (3) → community-level impacts
NATO / Russian drone	Fear, Defensiveness (3) → escalation risk	Concern (3–4) → NATO stability	Neutral Analysis (3) → historical/geopolitical frame
Israel airstrike in Doha	Reassurance (4) → Israel decisive, justifiable	Concern (4) → escalation risk	Neutral/Analytical (3) → U.S., Qatar, Israel dynamics
9/11 anniversary	Pride, Mourning (3–4) → remembrance	Reflection, Concern (3) → impact of terrorism	Neutral, Reflective (3) → remembrance, context

---

Step 3: Non-Overlapping Stories

Outlet	Story	Emotion(s)	Why Others Didn’t Cover
Fox News	Crime by immigrants (train stabbing, vigil violence, “culture war” angles)	Anger, Distrust	Fits culture-war framing, less relevant for CNN/NPR
CNN	AI misinformation & Secret Service scandal	Concern, Skepticism	Emphasized accountability, while Fox/NPR focused elsewhere
NPR	Martian rock discovery & South Korean immigration raid	Curiosity, Concern	Reflective, science/global coverage not aligned with Fox/CNN priorities

---

Step 4: Quadrant Mapping

Our Results:

• Fox News → concentrated in Negative Reactive (anger, fear, outrage) with spikes into Positive Reactive (reassurance, defensiveness). Center of gravity sits in negative/positive reactive overlap.
• CNN → clustered in Negative Reflective (concern, empathy) with moments of Negative Reactive. Center of gravity firmly reflective negative.
• NPR → grounded in Neutral/Analytical and Negative Reflective. Center of gravity deeply reflective.

Visual Map:

---

Step 5: Comparative Perspectives (Gemini & Grok)

Gemini’s Findings:

• Fox News: Negative/Reactive → anger, distrust, reassurance.
• CNN: Negative/Reflective → concern, skepticism, caution.
• NPR: Neutral/Reflective → analysis, empathy, critical thinking.
  Conclusion: Gemini emphasizes a sharp split: Fox as reactive, CNN as concerned, NPR as thoughtful.

Grok’s Findings:

• Fox News: Positive/Reactive mix → reassurance/defensiveness, but also anger and distrust.
• CNN: Negative/Reflective → concern, empathy, alarm at polarization.
• NPR: Neutral/Analytical → analytical coverage, empathy, reflection.
  Conclusion: Grok highlights Fox blending outrage and reassurance, CNN amplifying systemic concern, and NPR staying in analysis mode.

Cross-AI Comparison:

• All three analyses agree Fox blends outrage and reassurance to rally its base.
• CNN is consistently framed around concern, empathy, and skepticism — though Grok finds hints of reflection more than pure outrage.
• NPR is the most stable across all evaluations, consistently reflective and analytical.

---

Conclusion

This week, Fox News sought to make audiences feel outraged at political violence, defensive of Trump, and reassured by strong action. CNN leaned into concern and empathy, stressing the risks of polarization and escalation. NPR emphasized thoughtful reflection, encouraging listeners to step back and consider implications for democracy, global stability, and civic life.

The quadrant framework, enriched by Grok’s and Gemini’s analyses, makes clear that U.S. outlets continue to reinforce distinct emotional ecosystems: Fox reactive, CNN reflective but alarmed, NPR analytical and empathetic.