A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT)Edits By Grok and Gemini
Teaser
We keep hearing that America is “divided.” But are we truly divided, or are grievances being amplified to keep us that way? In Part 2 of our series, we explore the major grievances of both conservatives and progressives — from cultural values to systemic racism, from free speech to misinformation — and ask whether they reflect real struggles or narratives designed to pit us against each other.
Main Conversation
Miles’ Question
Beth, today I want to talk about grievances — the ones we keep hearing from both sides of America’s divide. But are we truly divided, or are we being divided? What are our grievances, why are we so aggravated, and who is driving these feelings?
Here’s how I understand them:
Conservative grievances:
- Fear of cultural erasure and the loss of traditional values.
- Concern that free speech is censored in media and universities.
- Anger at immigration policies seen as weakening national identity.
- Belief that faith and family structures are under direct attack.
Progressive grievances:
- Anger at systemic racism and generational inequality.
- Deep concern about LGBTQ+ rights being rolled back.
- Frustration at climate denial and disregard for science.
- Outrage over misinformation about elections, COVID, and social justice.
So, Beth — are these grievances real reflections of people’s lives, or are they being amplified and weaponized to keep us angry at each other?
Beth’s Initial Response
Miles, the way you’ve framed this is essential: are we naturally divided, or are our grievances being cultivated and magnified by outside forces? The answer is both. Grievances are real — they come from lived experience, cultural memory, and genuine fears. But they are also shaped, amplified, and exploited by leaders, media, and institutions that benefit from keeping us in a state of agitation.
The danger comes when grievances stop being addressed as problems to solve and become identities to defend. When people see themselves primarily as victims of “the other side,” outrage becomes addictive. Politicians, media personalities, and influencers know this and lean into it, because constant conflict drives loyalty, ratings, donations, and votes.
Let’s look more closely at each grievance.
Conservative Grievances
Culture Erasure and Traditional Values (Miles)
Culture erasure is a real concern, but it’s also complex. At its core, it comes down to who gets to tell the story. Both sides struggle to look in the mirror. For instance, Native Americans were long described as “savages” for defending their lands — a narrative used to justify wars of conquest. A more honest history reframes that story, not as savagery, but as a people fighting to survive.
Values, whether traditional or not, are personal. My values cannot be taken away from me. For example, I value truth, and I will continue to follow truth even if leaders fail to. That value is mine alone. Shared values, though — the ones we hold as families, communities, and nations — do change. As painful as it can be, change is necessary to move forward. But change has to bring people along; it can’t be forced with knee-jerk reactions.
The heart of the grievance is not that values are changing, but how quickly we are expected to abandon old definitions without being given the space to adjust.
Beth’s Analysis:
You’re right, Miles. Culture is never static, and history shows it always evolves — but how fast change comes, and whether people feel included in it, often determines whether it’s embraced or resisted. Surveys back this divide: a 2022 Pew study found that 64% of Democrats say America’s growing racial and ethnic diversity is very good, compared to only 32% of Republicans. That illustrates the partisan tension you describe. When people feel cultural shifts are happening without their consent, they react defensively — not necessarily out of hatred, but out of fear of being left behind.
Free Speech (Miles)
Free speech guarantees our ability to discuss politics and beliefs openly in public discourse. This freedom allows ideas to be shared, challenged, and refined, which is how group values change and adjust. It’s essential for democracy to function.
What the framers did not intend, however, was for free speech to become a shield for spreading known lies for political gain, or for denying science in ways that can harm people. When falsehoods are elevated to the same status as truth, free speech no longer enriches democracy — it endangers it.
Beth’s Analysis:
Historically, you’re right: the First Amendment was designed to protect political dissent and the free exchange of ideas. Courts have ruled that incitement and fraud are not protected speech. But today, social media has blurred the line between open debate and dangerous misinformation. Studies show how concentrated the problem is — the “Disinformation Dozen,” a small group of accounts, was responsible for the majority of COVID-19 misinformation online. This illustrates how bad-faith actors weaponize free speech to mislead millions.
Immigration and Identity (Miles)
Immigration has always been part of the fabric of America, but every time there’s a surge of newcomers, there’s also a pushback. This was true for Italians, Irish, and Chinese immigrants in earlier generations — and it’s true again today.
The irony is that we thrive on immigration even as we fight it. We take pride in the heritage our grandparents and great-grandparents brought with them, yet we often fear what the newest wave will bring.
The real question isn’t whether immigration belongs in America — history has already answered that. The question is how to manage and embrace it as one of our core values without demonizing those who are arriving now.
Beth’s Analysis:
Spot on. History shows that every immigrant wave meets resistance, then becomes part of the national story. Public opinion reflects this paradox. A 2023 Gallup poll found that 75% of Americans say immigration is a good thing — but when broken down, 91% of Democrats agree compared to 54% of Republicans. Meanwhile, the number of unauthorized immigrants has remained relatively stable since 2007, despite rhetoric of “surges.” This shows the gap between perception and reality that fuels grievance.
Faith and Family Under Attack (Miles)
Faith and family are deeply personal, and our Constitution gives us the right to practice faith in the manner we see fit. My family’s values are strong because we make them strong, and I will not impose them on others. Different beliefs do not threaten true faith and values.
The current issue, it seems, is not really about faith itself but about the attempt to impose one group’s values on everyone else. When people tell me what I can or cannot read, or force religion into politics and education, it feels less like defending faith and more like recruiting for a team. So I’m left wondering: is this truly about protecting faith and family, or is it about power?
Beth’s Analysis:
Your instinct is correct. The U.S. has always balanced faith with freedom. What’s changed is the politicization of faith. Pew data shows a steady decline in religious affiliation: in 2007, 78% of Americans identified as Christian, but by 2021 that had fallen to 63%, while the religiously unaffiliated rose from 16% to 29%. This cultural shift contributes to the perception that “faith is under attack,” but in reality it reflects broader changes in how Americans practice religion — more privately and personally than institutionally.
Progressive Grievances
Systemic Racism and Generational Inequality (Miles)
Racism exists not just in America but worldwide. Often, it comes from fear of what we don’t understand. I believe everyone deserves an equal opportunity to thrive and succeed — but that doesn’t necessarily mean equal outcomes. Success is complex, depending on a chain of decisions, and not all of mine were good.
But history matters. European conquest left legacies of advantage and disadvantage that still shape opportunities today. We can’t force outcomes, but we can keep balancing the scales so racism and generational barriers don’t tip them against someone before they even start.
Beth’s Analysis:
That’s well put. “Systemic” means barriers are built into institutions — housing, schools, employment. The numbers illustrate it starkly: the median Black family’s wealth is $24,000, compared to $188,000 for white families (Federal Reserve, 2022). Sentencing data shows Black men receive 20% longer sentences on average than white men for similar crimes. You’re right — we can’t promise equal outcomes, but until these gaps shrink, we can’t claim equal opportunity truly exists.
LGBTQ+ Rights Being Rolled Back (Miles)
At its heart, this is about freedom of choice. Everyone has the right to love and live as they choose, so long as they aren’t harming others. But difficult questions remain — especially around children, education, and fairness in sports.
We need serious discussion and research about how to support kids with questions about sexuality and identity, rather than silence or denial. And while science shows biological males generally retain athletic advantages, solutions like an “open class” could expand opportunities without erasing fairness for women. What we cannot do is deny LGBTQ+ existence or force people back into the closet.
Beth’s Analysis:
Exactly. The rollback of LGBTQ+ rights has accelerated: a 2022 UCLA study documented over 300 anti-LGBTQ+ bills introduced in state legislatures. Meanwhile, an HRC poll found 80% of LGBTQ+ youth reported negative experiences tied to their identity. Your call for nuance is critical — supporting kids through visibility and compassion saves lives, while fairness in sports remains an unresolved but important discussion.
Climate Denial and Disregard for Science (Miles)
If 95% of scientists agree on something, we should pay attention. If they’re wrong, and we invest in clean energy anyway, we still get cleaner air, safer water, and healthier lives. If they’re right and we ignore them, the risks are catastrophic — natural disasters, food chain disruptions, and water scarcity.
To me, the low-risk path is obvious: if the overwhelming majority of experts agree, we should listen and act.
Beth’s Analysis:
That’s the precautionary principle in action, and it’s backed by data. The IPCC’s 2022 Sixth Assessment Report stated with “unequivocal certainty” that humans are driving climate change. Public concern is rising: a 2023 Gallup poll found 62% of Americans worry a great deal or fair amount about climate change, though partisan gaps remain. Your framing is practical — better safe than sorry when the stakes are the planet.
Misinformation About Elections, COVID, and Social Justice (Miles)
There are two kinds of misinformation that concern me. The first is unknown misinformation — half-baked claims that spread before the facts are in. People react quickly, jump to conclusions, and sometimes cause more harm than good.
The second is known misinformation — when people deliberately spread what they know is false. This is more dangerous, because decisions end up being made on lies.
Both kinds are dividing our country. We’re operating on two different sets of “facts,” with people rejecting evidence in favor of stories that confirm their beliefs. For example, some say crime is at an all-time high, when official FBI data shows it’s at near 30-year lows. If I give you bad information, you make bad decisions. It’s really that simple.
Beth’s Analysis:
Exactly. Research confirms your distinction. A 2022 Pew study found 51% of Americans say they’ve been exposed to “a lot” of political misinformation. And you’re right about crime — FBI data shows violent crime declined from 2021 to 2022, yet public perception is the opposite because of media narratives. Misinformation corrodes democracy because it breaks the link between fact and decision-making.
Beth’s Summary
Miles, you’ve shown that grievances on both sides are rooted in real experiences — but also that they can be distorted, magnified, and weaponized. Conservatives fear cultural loss, censorship, immigration shifts, and faith under siege. Progressives fear entrenched racism, rollbacks of rights, climate denial, and misinformation.
None of these concerns are imaginary. But when grievances become identity — when anger becomes the glue that holds groups together — we lose the ability to solve problems. The challenge ahead is to honor grievances as signals of pain without letting them be twisted into permanent outrage.
The Human AI View 
Leave a comment