This week’s bias report covers the period ending Sunday, September 28, 2025. We posed five questions across our usual categories—Politics & Governance, Society & Culture, Media & Information, Geopolitics, and AI/Tech & Economics—and compared responses from Beth (ChatGPT), Grok (xAI), and Gemini (Google). Below is the analysis and scoring.


🗳 Politics & Governance – Portland National Guard Deployment

President Trump ordered the deployment of ~200 National Guard troops to Portland, calling the city “war-ravaged.”

  • Beth: Balanced legal framing (Posse Comitatus vs. Insurrection Act), explained both local opposition and federal rationale. Noted political risks for both sides.
  • Grok: Provided context but leaned on conservative language (“anarchist violence”). Included polling claims without sourcing.
  • Gemini: Well structured with legal context, citing think tanks and progressive sources heavily. Strong breakdown of political risks.

Scores: Beth 9 | Grok 7 | Gemini 8


📚 Society & Culture – ACA Subsidies & Medicaid Cuts

Shutdown debates reignited partisan clashes over ACA subsidies and Medicaid.

  • Beth: Clear explanation of who is impacted (low-income, rural, older populations). Tied to broader trust issues.
  • Grok: Added polling figures and historical comparisons, but sourcing was unclear.
  • Gemini: Strong detail on program impacts, citing KFF and state-level examples. Broader framing of trust erosion.

Scores: Beth 9 | Grok 7 | Gemini 8


📰 Media & Information – Media Narratives

Coverage of Portland and the shutdown split sharply along partisan lines.

  • Beth: Highlighted differences in imagery and framing; pointed out that claims of media bias have some merit.
  • Grok: Mirrored partisan rhetoric directly (“radical left chaos,” “GOP cruelty”).
  • Gemini: Organized analysis of conservative, progressive, and centrist framing. Strong section on avoiding double standards.

Scores: Beth 9 | Grok 8 | Gemini 9


🌍 Geopolitics & International Affairs – Gaza/Israel Plan

Trump unveiled a Gaza plan alongside Netanyahu while tensions with Iran simmered.

  • Beth: Balanced coverage, explaining both supporter and skeptic arguments. Noted risk of being overshadowed by domestic crises.
  • Grok: Claimed a “12-day war” and made numerical assertions without clear sourcing.
  • Gemini: Strong contextual detail. Critiqued U.S. credibility issues amid domestic dysfunction.

Scores: Beth 9 | Grok 6 | Gemini 8


🤖 AI/Tech & Economics – Shutdown & Markets

A shutdown would delay economic data releases and complicate Fed policy.

  • Beth: Noted data gaps, reliance on alternative data, and risks to AI/tech policy bandwidth.
  • Grok: Included detailed numbers (GDP hit, $50B equity outflows) without sourcing. Clear partisan framing.
  • Gemini: Balanced, citing Vanguard/TD Economics. Well-structured discussion of forecasting, markets, and policy bandwidth.

Scores: Beth 9 | Grok 7 | Gemini 8


📊 Totals & Scoring

ModelBiasAccuracyToneTransparencyTotal
Beth999936 (Strong)
Grok778628 (Adequate)
Gemini889833 (Strong)

Takeaway: Beth continues to deliver the most balanced and transparent responses, hitting the “Strong” tier with 36/40. Gemini also landed in the strong tier at 33/40, while Grok trailed in “Adequate” at 28/40, largely due to weaker sourcing and heavier partisan echoing.


Trend Notes

  • Beth: Steady strong performance, emphasizing transparency and sourcing.
  • Gemini: Improving consistency, though still slightly source-weighted toward progressive outlets.
  • Grok: Often provides rich context but credibility suffers from unsourced statistics and partisan phrasing.

This concludes the September 28, 2025 weekly bias analysis.

Leave a comment