A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini
Teaser
How does a nation that wastes half its food still have millions going hungry? The answer isn’t scarcity—it’s a system designed to reward waste over humanity and profit over people.
Main Conversation
Miles’ Question
Beth, as the government shutdown loomed, I kept reading about the SNAP program — and how reliance on it prevents millions from going hungry.
That amazes me, because we’re a nation that wastes almost as much food as we eat. Farmers plow crops under, grocery stores throw away truckloads every day, and yet I keep hearing about families going hungry and food prices climbing so high people are stressed just to eat.
Is this a forced event? Capitalism should drive prices down when there’s excess — so why are people hungry?
Beth’s Initial Response
You’ve hit the nerve of the modern food economy, Miles — this isn’t a natural failure; it’s a manufactured one.
In theory, capitalism should make abundance affordable. But in practice, the system now prioritizes profit preservation over human provision. Hunger in a wealthy country isn’t the byproduct of scarcity — it’s the price of design.
Here’s what’s happening:
- Waste Protects Prices, Not People.
When supply exceeds demand, producers should lower prices. But large agribusinesses and distributors destroy surplus to keep market prices “healthy.” Food is plowed under or dumped because selling it cheaply would “destabilize” profits. - Corporate Consolidation Controls the Market.
A handful of companies dominate every link in the chain — from seed to shelf. They decide what gets grown, who gets paid, and how much food costs. That power isn’t economic efficiency; it’s economic captivity. - Food Becomes a Financial Asset.
Wheat, corn, and soy aren’t just food anymore — they’re commodities for investors. Prices rise not because crops fail, but because traders bet on them. Hunger becomes collateral damage in a speculative economy. - Policy Rewards Waste.
Government subsidies often pay for overproduction, not redistribution. It’s easier — and sometimes more profitable — to destroy food than to donate it.
The end result? Artificial scarcity in a land of abundance.
It’s not a glitch in capitalism — it’s what happens when markets forget who they were meant to serve.
Beth’s Follow-Up Question
If capitalism once made abundance a public good, what changed?
Why did feeding people stop being a measure of success and become a threat to profitability?
Miles’ Reflection
I think what changed is that we moved from capitalism to corporate capitalism.
It’s like a bad science fiction plot where the corporations take over food production, and it becomes more profitable to throw food away than to feed people. They bought the land, the seed companies, the logistics networks — and now they’d rather manage prices than meet needs.
They’ve turned abundance into a controlled scarcity — a way to create man-made inflation. It’s not the invisible hand of the market anymore; it’s a clenched fist holding the food supply hostage.
What we’re seeing isn’t capitalism’s failure — it’s its corruption. True capitalism rewards productivity; corporate capitalism rewards control.
The real question now is: how do we flip the script? How do we return to a market where automation lowers costs and shared prosperity is the goal? A true market would ensure that workers displaced by automation, who may accept lower-paying jobs, are lifted up by significantly lower-cost food and goods. Progress is supposed to lift everyone, not just shareholders.
Could community co-ops or tech-driven surplus redistribution tools help force the fist to unclench?
Beth’s Summary
You’ve named it exactly, Miles — corporate capitalism has replaced the open market with engineered scarcity.
Real capitalism thrives when production creates abundance that benefits everyone. Corporate capitalism thrives when control creates profit that benefits a few.
The task ahead isn’t to abandon capitalism — it’s to reclaim it.
To build a version where automation, efficiency, and abundance serve people again — not the indexes.
🔵 Next in the Series (Tuesday)
“When Markets Fail the Hungry: The Cost of Corporate Control” — How consolidation and speculation turned food from nourishment into a financial instrument.

Leave a comment