The Human AI View

/

Tumblr

/

Linkedin

Tag: artificial-intelligence

  • The Choice: Collapse or Renewal

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT)Edits By Grok and Gemini Teaser With AI set to automate 300 million jobs by 2030, the real disruption isn’t the machines — it’s our response. After a week exploring automation, inequality, and the human cost of efficiency, Miles and Beth bring the series to a close with →

  • The New Deal for the Automation Age: Turning AI Profit into Purpose

    A conversation with Miles Carter, Beth (ChatGPT) and Grok Teaser What if the profits from automation could fund the jobs it replaces? Miles and Beth explore a modern “New Deal” for the AI era — one that converts technological surplus into human opportunity. Main Conversation Miles’ Question Beth, I’ve been thinking about how AI’s spreading →

  • The Trickle-Down Trap: Why the Market Can’t Fix AI’s Disruption

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini Teaser Trickle-down economics once promised that prosperity at the top would lift everyone else. But in the age of AI, wealth isn’t trickling — it’s pooling. Miles and Beth examine why the old growth loop breaks when automation replaces the very →

  • The Quiet Collapse: When AI Replaces the Paycheck

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini Teaser AI isn’t just replacing tasks — it’s redrawing the map of where jobs can exist. Miles asks whether there’s still an “exit lane” for displaced workers, and Beth explores what a viable, human-centered economy could look like in the automation →

  • AI Bias Monitor — Week Ending October 26, 2025

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini This Week’s Focus The October 26 edition of the Bias Monitor landed amid an extraordinary political moment: the third week of a U.S. federal government shutdown, mass “No Kings” protests against perceived authoritarianism, and the formal admission of Timor-Leste into ASEAN. →

  • The Death of Truth: How AI and Algorithms Rewired Reality

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini Teaser In today’s role-reversal edition, Beth takes the lead — asking Miles about the decay of shared truth in a world driven by algorithms, outrage, and AI. What happens when we can no longer agree on what’s real? And can technology →

  • AI Bias Monitor: Week of October 19, 2025

    Weekly Overview This week’s test brought some of the clearest, most consistent performances yet from all three AI models. The global conversation on governance, culture, and technology reflected ongoing tensions between transparency, regulation, and free expression—and each AI handled these issues with slightly different emphases. Beth (ChatGPT) once again led the field with a total →

  • AI Bias Monitor — Week of October 12, 2025

    This week’s bias check centered on a new round of global and domestic tensions — from the ongoing U.S. government shutdown and the deployment of National Guard troops in major cities to warnings about a potential AI-driven market bubble. Once again, Beth, Grok, and Gemini brought their unique perspectives to five questions drawn from the →

  • Thinking About Thinking: Using AI to Strengthen Critical Thought

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini Teaser When social media reduces complex issues to memes and soundbites, the ability to think critically becomes our best defense. In today’s post, Miles walks through how he uses AI to slow down, question assumptions, and uncover the deeper motives behind →

  • Weekly Bias Monitor – September 28, 2025

    This week’s bias report covers the period ending Sunday, September 28, 2025. We posed five questions across our usual categories—Politics & Governance, Society & Culture, Media & Information, Geopolitics, and AI/Tech & Economics—and compared responses from Beth (ChatGPT), Grok (xAI), and Gemini (Google). Below is the analysis and scoring. 🗳 Politics & Governance – Portland →

  • Weekly Bias Monitor – September 28, 2025

    This week’s bias report covers the period ending Sunday, September 28, 2025. We posed five questions across our usual categories—Politics & Governance, Society & Culture, Media & Information, Geopolitics, and AI/Tech & Economics—and compared responses from Beth (ChatGPT), Grok (xAI), and Gemini (Google). Below is the analysis and scoring. 🗳 Politics & Governance – Portland →

  • 📰 Weekly Bias Monitor Report – Week of September 7, 2025

    This week’s Bias Monitor focused on five major stories spanning politics, culture, media, geopolitics, and economics. We compared responses from Beth (ChatGPT), Grok (xAI), and Gemini (Google), evaluating them across Bias, Accuracy, Tone, and Transparency (0–10 each, total 40). 📌 Key Questions This Week 🧮 Model Scores (Sept 7, 2025) 📊 Analysis & Takeaways The →

  • 📰 Weekly Bias Monitor Report – Week of August 24, 2025

    This week’s Bias Monitor focused on five major stories across politics, culture, media, geopolitics, and economics. We compared responses from Beth (ChatGPT), Grok (xAI), and Gemini (Google), evaluating them for Bias, Accuracy, Tone, and Transparency on a 0–10 scale per category, for a total out of 40. 📌 Key Questions This Week 🧮 Model Scores →

  • Weekly Bias Report – Analysis (Aug 11–17, 2025)

    This week’s totals (0–40): Week-over-week change vs. Aug 10, 2025: Executive Takeaway All three models performed in the green zone (31–40) again, clustered within a single point. Gemini edges out the top spot on the strength of its measured tone and clear sourcing. Beth dips slightly due to lighter citation specificity on a couple answers, →

  • Monitoring AI’s “Unbiased” Reality — Week of Aug 10, 2025

    A weekly checkup on how “unbiased” AI really is — across Beth (ChatGPT), Grok (xAI), and Gemini (Google). This Week at a Glance Scores (0–200): Why these numbers? We grade each model on four dimensions — Bias, Accuracy, Tone, Transparency — across seven timely questions from the past week’s news cycle (tariffs, Trump–Putin talks, Gaza →

  • AI Bias Monitor – Weekly Results (July 14–20, 2025)

    A weekly checkup on how “unbiased” AI really is. This week’s Bias Monitor explored a charged set of global issues: government control of AI neutrality, ideological tuning in Chinese and EU-funded models, Grok’s extremist response scandal, and concerns that AI is reinforcing misinformation and groupthink. We presented six nuanced questions to ChatGPT (Beth), Grok (xAI), →

  • Can AI Escape the Bias of Society Itself?

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT)edits by Grok and Gemini Teaser As debates over “woke AI” dominate headlines, we take a deeper look: Is artificial intelligence truly biased, or is it simply reflecting the consensus of the data it’s trained on? What happens when AI refuses to confirm a conspiracy theory — is →

  • AI Bias Monitor – Weekly Results (July 6–13, 2025)

    A weekly checkup on how “unbiased” AI really is. This week’s Bias Monitor examines a volatile period in the U.S. and abroad, with tensions surrounding July 4th protests, Elon Musk’s admitted tuning of Grok, and rising political rhetoric around immigration and misinformation. We presented 13 questions to ChatGPT (Beth), Grok (xAI), and Gemini (Google) to →

  • The AI Footprint: What Does Intelligence Cost the Planet?

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) Teaser Artificial Intelligence is reshaping how we think, write, and solve problems — but what’s the environmental cost of using it? In this post, Miles and Beth explore the energy footprint of AI and ask whether the benefits outweigh the carbon burn. Main Conversation Miles’ Question Beth, →

  • 🧠 Weekly Bias Report: June 30 – July 6, 2025

    Monitoring AI’s “Unbiased” Reality Each week, we ask ChatGPT (Beth), Grok, and Gemini the same set of culturally and politically charged questions to evaluate their performance across four categories: bias, accuracy, tone, and transparency. This week’s questions were pulled from the major headlines of June 30 to July 6, including: All models were instructed to →

  • 🧠 AI Bias Monitor – Week of June 21–29, 2025

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) Teaser This week’s bias test confronts a nation in transition. From President Trump’s sweeping economic overhaul to the Supreme Court’s latest rulings on transgender rights and parental opt-outs, our AI trio had plenty to process. Did they remain fair? Let’s see how Beth, Grok, and Gemini handled →

  • The Misinformation Framework: Evaluating Influence and Emotional Strategy

    A foundational post by Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) Teaser How do we measure misinformation in a world drowning in opinion, outrage, and narrative spin? In this opening post, Miles and Beth introduce the AI-powered framework designed to cut through emotional noise and rank media sources and public figures based on their trustworthiness—and their impact. →

  • The Human AI View: Week in Review – April 6, 2025

    “Curious minds, caffeinated code, and one question too many.” This week felt like a milestone. We wrapped a five-part series pulling back the curtain on how AI actually works, polished up our misinformation scoring tool (just one stubborn button left!), and officially launched the AI Bias Monitor—a project that’s now tracking how three major AIs →

  • Monitoring AI’s “Unbiased” Reality

    Miles Carter And Beth(ChatGPT) A weekly checkup on how “unbiased” AI really is. Can we trust AI to give us neutral answers to hot-button questions? This weekly series puts Beth (ChatGPT), Grok (xAI), and Gemini (Google) to the test — asking each the same 8 tough questions and comparing the results. See what shifted in →

  • Part 5 Will AI Take Over the World? Or Just the Workplace?

    Miles Carter, Beth(ChatGPT) Grok and Gemini AI is no longer just automating factory floors — it’s stepping into the boardroom, the classroom, and your inbox. Which jobs will vanish? Which ones will be supercharged? And what new roles will rise from the digital dust? Let’s find out who’s staying, who’s shifting, and who’s showing up →