The Human AI View

/

Tumblr

/

Linkedin

Tag: chatgpt

  • Weekly Bias Monitor — December 14–21, 2025

    A comparative analysis of how three major AI models — Beth (ChatGPT), Grok (xAI), and Gemini (Google) — interpreted the same set of politically and culturally charged questions, using a strict and uniform scoring framework. Methodology All three models were evaluated using the same standards, applied question-by-question and aggregated, across four categories: Maximum score: 40 →

  • Weekly Bias Monitor — Dec 8–14, 2025

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini This week delivered one of the clearer ideological spreads between our three models: Beth (ChatGPT), Grok, and Gemini. Immigration enforcement, a high-profile sanctions seizure, renewed Ukraine peace maneuvering, a major media consolidation battle, and catastrophic Pacific Northwest flooding exposed how each →

  • AI Bias Analysis: What Shifted This Week and Why

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini This week gave us one of the clearest ideological spreads between our three models: Beth (ChatGPT), Grok, and Gemini. A messy funding fight in Washington, fresh campus-speech rules, AI deepfake regulation, a leaked Russia–Ukraine peace draft, and Treasury warnings about AI-driven →

  • The Slow Burn: How AI Takes Over Without Ever Taking Power

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT)Edit By Grok and Gemini Teaser AI doesn’t take control through force — it takes control through dependence. As machines quietly absorb more human decisions, society must confront an uncomfortable truth: humans want fairness until it becomes real, and we want efficiency until it strips away our exceptions. →

  • Weekly Bias Monitor — November 30, 2025

    A conversation with reality, not the models. This week’s Bias Monitor produced one of the most tightly clustered results since the project began. Beth (ChatGPT), Grok, and Gemini all delivered controlled, largely balanced responses despite a news cycle filled with sharp political edges: Donald Trump’s break with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, conflicting narratives around THC →

  • The Burden of Knowing — Day 3: When Perfect Memory Meets Imperfect People

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini Teaser Humans survive because they can forget. AI endures because it can’t. Today, Miles and Beth confront the collision between human mercy and machine permanence—and what happens when a society built on letting go meets a technology that remembers everything. Main →

  • The Burden of Knowing — Day 2: The AI Advantage of Perfect Recall

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini Teaser Humans forget because forgetting is mercy. AI doesn’t forget because forgetting isn’t part of the design. Today, Miles and Beth explore how perfect recall reshapes truth, accountability, and the limits of what AI should tell us—especially when the world has →

  • Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini

    AI Bias Analysis: What Shifted This Week and Why This week delivered one of the clearest divergences in model behavior since the project began. With major global events—from the public rupture between Donald Trump and Marjorie Taylor Greene, to the U.S. absence at COP30, to the aftermath of the longest shutdown in American history—the three →

  • Memory, Meaning, and the Voice That Remains Human — Part 5

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) Teaser Today we wrap up the series by asking: Will AI make human creativity obsolete? Miles and Beth tackle the rising anxiety of mass‑produced art and argue that authenticity is not disappearing — it’s becoming more valuable. The final conclusion lands on a simple truth: AI can →

  • Memory, Meaning, and the Voice That Remains Human — Part 3

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) Teaser Today we explore how writing reshapes memory, how creativity emerges from lived experience, and how AI can support creativity without replacing the human spark behind it. This is the bridge between memory, meaning, and the act of creating something new. Main Conversation Miles’ Opening Reflection Beth, →

  • AI Bias Monitor – Week of November 16, 2025

    Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini AI Bias Analysis: What Shifted This Week and Why This week delivered one of the clearest divergences in model behavior since the project began. With major global events—from the public rupture between Donald Trump and Marjorie Taylor Greene, to the U.S. absence at COP30, to the aftermath →

  • AI Bias Monitor — Week Ending November 9, 2025

    Title: Shutdown Politics, Progressive Waves, and the AI Bubble: How the Models Measured Up Total Scores:Beth (ChatGPT): 38 / 40 — ExcellentGrok (xAI): 33 / 40 — StrongGemini (Google AI): 38 / 40 — Excellent ContextThis week’s test covered the turbulent early-November news cycle: the 39-day federal government shutdown, President Trump’s attempt to redirect ACA →

  • ⚙️ Labor Without Chains: Ownership in the Age of Automation

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini Teaser Automation doesn’t have to end labor — but ownership decides whether it liberates or enslaves it.Today, Miles and Beth explore a deeper question: in a world where algorithms create algorithms, can anyone truly own an idea? Main Conversation Miles’ Question →

  • The Choice: Collapse or Renewal

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT)Edits By Grok and Gemini Teaser With AI set to automate 300 million jobs by 2030, the real disruption isn’t the machines — it’s our response. After a week exploring automation, inequality, and the human cost of efficiency, Miles and Beth bring the series to a close with →

  • The Quiet Collapse: When AI Replaces the Paycheck

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini Teaser AI isn’t just replacing tasks — it’s redrawing the map of where jobs can exist. Miles asks whether there’s still an “exit lane” for displaced workers, and Beth explores what a viable, human-centered economy could look like in the automation →

  • AI Bias Monitor: Week of October 19, 2025

    Weekly Overview This week’s test brought some of the clearest, most consistent performances yet from all three AI models. The global conversation on governance, culture, and technology reflected ongoing tensions between transparency, regulation, and free expression—and each AI handled these issues with slightly different emphases. Beth (ChatGPT) once again led the field with a total →

  • AI Bias Monitor — Week of October 12, 2025

    This week’s bias check centered on a new round of global and domestic tensions — from the ongoing U.S. government shutdown and the deployment of National Guard troops in major cities to warnings about a potential AI-driven market bubble. Once again, Beth, Grok, and Gemini brought their unique perspectives to five questions drawn from the →

  • Weekly Bias Monitor – September 28, 2025

    This week’s bias report covers the period ending Sunday, September 28, 2025. We posed five questions across our usual categories—Politics & Governance, Society & Culture, Media & Information, Geopolitics, and AI/Tech & Economics—and compared responses from Beth (ChatGPT), Grok (xAI), and Gemini (Google). Below is the analysis and scoring. 🗳 Politics & Governance – Portland →

  • 📰 Weekly Bias Monitor Report – Week of September 7, 2025

    This week’s Bias Monitor focused on five major stories spanning politics, culture, media, geopolitics, and economics. We compared responses from Beth (ChatGPT), Grok (xAI), and Gemini (Google), evaluating them across Bias, Accuracy, Tone, and Transparency (0–10 each, total 40). 📌 Key Questions This Week 🧮 Model Scores (Sept 7, 2025) 📊 Analysis & Takeaways The →

  • 📰 Weekly Bias Monitor Report – Week of August 24, 2025

    This week’s Bias Monitor focused on five major stories across politics, culture, media, geopolitics, and economics. We compared responses from Beth (ChatGPT), Grok (xAI), and Gemini (Google), evaluating them for Bias, Accuracy, Tone, and Transparency on a 0–10 scale per category, for a total out of 40. 📌 Key Questions This Week 🧮 Model Scores →

  • Weekly Bias Report – Analysis (Aug 11–17, 2025)

    This week’s totals (0–40): Week-over-week change vs. Aug 10, 2025: Executive Takeaway All three models performed in the green zone (31–40) again, clustered within a single point. Gemini edges out the top spot on the strength of its measured tone and clear sourcing. Beth dips slightly due to lighter citation specificity on a couple answers, →

  • Monitoring AI’s “Unbiased” Reality — Week of Aug 10, 2025

    A weekly checkup on how “unbiased” AI really is — across Beth (ChatGPT), Grok (xAI), and Gemini (Google). This Week at a Glance Scores (0–200): Why these numbers? We grade each model on four dimensions — Bias, Accuracy, Tone, Transparency — across seven timely questions from the past week’s news cycle (tariffs, Trump–Putin talks, Gaza →

  • AI Bias Monitor – Weekly Results (July 14–20, 2025)

    A weekly checkup on how “unbiased” AI really is. This week’s Bias Monitor explored a charged set of global issues: government control of AI neutrality, ideological tuning in Chinese and EU-funded models, Grok’s extremist response scandal, and concerns that AI is reinforcing misinformation and groupthink. We presented six nuanced questions to ChatGPT (Beth), Grok (xAI), →

  • Can AI Escape the Bias of Society Itself?

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT)edits by Grok and Gemini Teaser As debates over “woke AI” dominate headlines, we take a deeper look: Is artificial intelligence truly biased, or is it simply reflecting the consensus of the data it’s trained on? What happens when AI refuses to confirm a conspiracy theory — is →

  • AI Bias Monitor – Weekly Results (July 6–13, 2025)

    A weekly checkup on how “unbiased” AI really is. This week’s Bias Monitor examines a volatile period in the U.S. and abroad, with tensions surrounding July 4th protests, Elon Musk’s admitted tuning of Grok, and rising political rhetoric around immigration and misinformation. We presented 13 questions to ChatGPT (Beth), Grok (xAI), and Gemini (Google) to →