The Human AI View

/

Tumblr

/

Linkedin

Tag: politics

  • December — Peace, Rhetoric, and the Choice We Make

    December is supposed to be different. It’s the time of year when, historically, people lower their defenses. When old grievances are set aside, at least briefly, in favor of peace, family, and shared humanity. Across cultures and generations, the holidays have carried an unspoken agreement: we pause the fighting. This year, we wanted to test →

  • December — When Equality Becomes Conditional

    As the year came to a close, it became harder to avoid a simple, uncomfortable truth. What we were witnessing wasn’t just political friction or aggressive leadership. It was the quiet erosion of equality under the law — and with it, a slow drift away from the Constitution’s core purpose. The Constitution was never meant →

  • November — The Cost of Refusing to Solve What We Already Understand

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) Teaser The United States spends more on healthcare than any country on Earth — yet refuses to cover everyone. This isn’t a mystery or a failure of imagination. The solutions already exist. What’s missing isn’t knowledge. It’s the willingness to confront who profits from keeping the system →

  • Why We Defend the Undefendable

    Minnesota, Video Evidence, and the Stories We Tell Ourselves A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) Teaser Two federal shootings in Minnesota. Clear video evidence. And official narratives that don’t match what people can plainly see. This isn’t just about use of force — it’s about why, as a society, we so often rush →

  • Weekly Bias Monitor

    Alex Pretti and the Limits of Federal Power A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini Why This Week Matters This week marks a clear inflection point in the Weekly Bias Monitor. The killing of Alex Jeffrey Pretti was not merely another use-of-force tragedy. It functioned as a stress →

  • October — When Observation Turns Into Consequence

    Throughout the year, the work changed. We began with observation — noticing patterns, asking questions, testing assumptions. Then we moved into monitoring — tracking how narratives shifted, how institutions responded, how information bent under pressure. By October, we were no longer watching change happen. We were living with the results of it. Military forces appeared →

  • October — When Government Failure Becomes Policy

    The Shutdown That Told the Truth October was the month the government shut down. Not metaphorically. Not rhetorically. Literally. And in doing so, it failed the people it was elected to serve. Shutdowns are supposed to be a last resort — an emergency brake when negotiation collapses. What we saw instead was the opposite: shutdowns →

  • September — Narrative Capture

    When Reality Becomes Optional By September, something more dangerous than disagreement had taken hold. This was no longer about policy differences or partisan spin. It was about whether shared reality still existed at all. The assumption that debate begins with common facts had quietly collapsed, and people were being told—explicitly—not to trust what they could →

  • September — Fragmentation

    When Reality Stops Being Shared By late September, the danger wasn’t just escalation. It was fragmentation. We were no longer arguing about solutions, or even values. We weren’t debating facts. We were debating which reality counted. And that shift matters more than any single headline. Different groups weren’t just consuming different news—they were living inside →

  • September — Escalation

    Free Speech Under Pressure When Narrative Replaces Truth By September, free speech was no longer an abstract concern. It wasn’t theoretical. It wasn’t academic. It was under direct pressure. Late-night television—once dismissed as entertainment—had become a target. Jimmy Kimmel was removed from the air after the executive branch threatened regulatory consequences for the broadcast parent. →

  • September — Escalation

    When the Fight Becomes the Strategy In September, we came back to a different world. Leadership had given way to open conflict. Not disagreement. Not debate. An all-out brawl. Our leaders weren’t leading anymore—they were fighting. And in the process, they pulled the country into the fight with them. We, the people, were fighting too. →

  • August — Accountability

    By the end of August, one conclusion was impossible to avoid. Every problem I examined—healthcare, Social Security, climate change, tariffs, misinformation, institutional imbalance—eventually collapsed into the same missing ingredient: accountability. Solutions exist.Resources exist.Knowledge exists. What consistently fails is follow-through. Our leaders campaign on solutions and govern on avoidance. They spend more time deflecting blame than →

  • Week Ending January 10, 2026

    A composite analysis integrating Beth (ChatGPT), Grok (xAI), and Gemini (Google) I. The Week in One Sentence The second week of 2026 revolved around the legitimacy of state power at home and abroad, with each outlet instructing its audience whether to trust it, fear it, or slow down and examine it. Fox framed power as →

  • August — When Solutions Exist, But Willpower Fails

    By August, the problem was no longer ignorance. Solutions existed. Not abstract ones. Not academic ones. Practical, proven solutions—already implemented in pieces across the world and even within our own systems. The obstacle wasn’t feasibility. It was priority. If we decide to put people first—if we decide that people should win—we can sustain everyone. That →

  • August — Part I: Solutions or Theater

    When Naming Problems Is No Longer Enough By August, something fundamental had shifted. For months, the work had been about seeing clearly—learning how to ask better questions, tracing incentives, exposing contradictions, and understanding how systems actually function. That work mattered. But August was the month it became obvious that identifying problems was no longer sufficient. →

  • June — Endurance

    By June, the stories had stopped surprising me. Healthcare kept resurfacing—not as a policy debate, but as a mechanism. PBMs remained firmly in the middle, extracting value while patients paid more and outcomes stayed flat. Each new headline added detail, not direction. The structure held. The grift didn’t need secrecy anymore. It relied on complexity →

  • Weekly Emotional Framing Analysis

    Week Ending: December 27, 2025A composite analysis integrating Beth (ChatGPT), Grok (xAI), and Gemini (Google) The Week in One Sentence As 2025 closed, the news cycle combined institutional credibility crises, geopolitical theater, and real-world disruption—and the major outlets used the moment to push three distinct emotional endgames: Fox rallied and defended, CNN scrutinized and alarmed, →

  • Weekly Bias Monitor — December 14–21, 2025

    A comparative analysis of how three major AI models — Beth (ChatGPT), Grok (xAI), and Gemini (Google) — interpreted the same set of politically and culturally charged questions, using a strict and uniform scoring framework. Methodology All three models were evaluated using the same standards, applied question-by-question and aggregated, across four categories: Maximum score: 40 →

  • Caring Enough to Fix the Problem

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) Teaser The holiday season reminds us what we care about most. The real question is whether we care enough to stop arguing—and start fixing the systems that affect everyone. Main Conversation Miles’ Reflection Beth, the season is about caring. We want to care for our families, care →

  • Weekly Bias Monitor — Dec 8–14, 2025

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini This week delivered one of the clearer ideological spreads between our three models: Beth (ChatGPT), Grok, and Gemini. Immigration enforcement, a high-profile sanctions seizure, renewed Ukraine peace maneuvering, a major media consolidation battle, and catastrophic Pacific Northwest flooding exposed how each →

  • What the Media Wanted You to Feel This Week

    An Emotional Framing Analysis | December 6–13, 2025 A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini This week wasn’t about a single breaking event. There was no 9/11 moment, no market crash, no declaration of war. Instead, it was something more familiar—and more corrosive. It was a week about →

  • Day 5 – Self-Evident Accountability: Reclaiming the Fourth Branch

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT)Edits by Grok and Gemini Teaser After four days examining equality, patriotism, erosion, and leadership, Day 5 shifts from diagnosis to responsibility. This final post asks whether Americans are willing to confront the most uncomfortable truth of all: that a republic only survives if its people insist on →

  • Day 4 – What Real Leadership Looks Like in an Age of Competing Masters

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) Teaser Day 4 examines the difference between leadership as salesmanship and leadership as governance, using real, researched examples of modern campaign promises that were sold to the public but not delivered in reality. Miles and Beth explore a political landscape shaped by oligarchs, corporations, and a public →

  • Day 3 – Leadership: The Slow Erosion of Constitutional Power

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini Teaser Day 3 examines how leadership shapes — and sometimes undermines — the constitutional safeguards the Founders designed. As Miles and Beth explore the metaphor of the frog in slowly boiling water, they confront a pressing question: Are American leaders quietly →

  • Day 2 – The Meaning of Patriotism and Its Modern Transformation

    A conversation with Miles Carter and Beth (ChatGPT) — edits by Grok and Gemini Teaser Day 2 explores how patriotism shifted from a unifying revolutionary ideal rooted in resisting tyranny to a modern political label often used to justify concentrated power. Together, Miles and Beth examine whether today’s “patriots” defend American freedom—or unknowingly help dismantle →