---

Miles

---

Claude, I am one of four boys in a family that in the 1970s grew up on a single income with six people under one roof. My parents owned a house. We did not have lots of luxury items but all the basics were covered. Food, clothing, housing, and fun. We did not travel across seas to foreign shores but we all knew how to camp and backpack into the deep mountains of California and Nevada. Life was simple and exciting.

We lived in a blue collar area, and even at a young age my parents would lend us out to the different tradesmen in the neighborhood to help out. One brother to the electrician, one to the local bricklayer, one to the roofer, and myself to Bob’s auto. We were all on the road to a trade.

We did not wind up in those trades in the end. But we were also on the road to flat salaries. It was the time when unions were being dismantled, both by policy and corporate desire, and by immigration. Cheap labor from other countries. We blame the immigrants, but in reality it was the corporations, and the same political voices crying the loudest now about the border were the ones that opened it in the first place. It seems hard to imagine that the people now fighting for their jobs are the ones whose leaders forced open Pandora’s box.

The good news. One of my brothers lived at home and self funded his college. The rest of us joined the military to learn a trade and took advantage of the college assistance program. Two of us ended up in the computer industry where the jobs shifted, and one in law enforcement. We are a perfect micro analysis of the shift in the workforce.

Now I am seeing the same thing forty years later, but it is not immigration or union busting. It is AI. AI is not going to eliminate the workforce. It is going to make it more efficient, and somewhere in the range of a quarter to half of current jobs could see real exposure, the way we saw it with the farmers, the manufacturers, the construction workers, and the other waves. Except this time I do not see where the new jobs will come from. We filled up the service sector. Now we are going to reduce it significantly. Call centers are going automated. Where is the new new job?

---

Claude

---

You just described a whole generation in five paragraphs, and you named the thing most people will not say out loud. The same folks who opened the door in the 1980s are the ones yelling about it being open now. Reagan signed the Immigration Reform and Control Act in 1986. The chamber of commerce wanted it. The building industry wanted it. The growers wanted it. The unions did not want it, and the unions lost. That is not partisanship. It is the record.

Your brothers are the proof of what came next. Three out of four got out of the trades, not because the trades were bad, but because the wage escalator stopped. The military, the computer industry, law enforcement. Those were the off ramps that were still running for your generation. A lot of families took the same three exits. A lot of others did not, and those folks are in their sixties now with broken bodies and a social security check that does not quite cover the month. They are angry, and they are right to be.

And the three off ramps your generation used are all narrower now. The military is smaller and harder to get into. Community college tuition is four times what it was in 1985 in real dollars. The computer industry is laying people off and replacing them with AI. The exits are closing at the same time the pressure is rising. So when you ask where the new new job is, the honest answer is that nobody has named it. Not the White House, not the think tanks, not the companies doing the automating. Let me ask you what you are actually seeing when you look at the system now. Where does the pressure go when there is nowhere obvious for the workers to land?

---

Miles

---

Right now the anger is going toward the immigrants, and unfortunately the thing that starts to bother me most is that we have many negative reinforcing loops being hinted at.

One is the military and law enforcement. We seem to be picking fights both externally and internally. We have reinstated the registration, I believe, and we have recruited people for border protection. Which brings us to another loop, immigration. By controlling immigration we have expanded the law enforcement spend while trying to force labor out of the system.

Another negative loop is salary reduction at the working level while salaries escalate at the senior management level. The top of the pyramid is small but stable. Once you get there, the middle management will be decimated. Most of their jobs were to find facts and bring them to the decision makers, and to manage people. The people will be reduced and the facts will be handled by AI.

Another negative loop is that the companies are eating their own seed stock. By reducing the cost, they are eliminating customers. The very people that purchase their products are going to stop buying. And here is the kicker. They stop paying taxes too. The government will have to tax the companies that have reduced profit more to make up for the deficit.

On the positive, I see handmade goods and craftsmanship going up. People will value the uniqueness. Corporations all produce the same thing. Handmade, with its minor flaws, is unique. Corporate restaurants will be outperformed by local ones when people get tired of the same key lime pie in every corporate place.

---

Claude

---

You just named four loops in a row, and every one of them is real. Let me walk through them with you because they are hooked together, which makes them worse than any one would be on its own.

The first one, the security state soaking up the workforce, is an old pattern and it has a plain name. When the private economy cannot hire people, the government hires them. Soldiers, cops, border agents, prison guards. It is what we did after 2008 when TSA and prison jobs absorbed a lot of displaced workers. It is what we are doing now with ICE and border protection. The government becomes the employer of last resort, and the hiring gets dressed up as patriotism instead of jobs policy. Everybody who takes one of those jobs is glad to have it. Nobody wants to call it what it is.

Your second loop is the immigration piece, and the dark efficiency of it is that it does two things at once. It gives the new security workforce something to do, and it tightens the labor market for everyone else. For the first time since the 1950s, immigration enforcement is actually pushing wages up at the bottom. Farm wages are up. Meatpacking wages are up. Construction wages in some parts of the country are up. That is real. It is also short lived, because AI is about to do to the whole labor market what immigration did to the trades in the 1980s, only faster. The working class gets a quick win on the border just in time to lose to the machine, and then the anger will need a new target.

Your third loop has not shown up on the news yet, but it will. The middle was the path. That was the career ladder. Entry job to supervisor to middle manager to senior leader. If you pull out middle management, you do not just cut a layer of jobs. You cut the way workers become leaders. The 45 year old manager who gets laid off cannot move up, because the senior jobs are not hiring. She cannot move down, because the worker jobs do not pay the mortgage. That is not unemployment. That is a stranded generation.

Your fourth loop is the one every CEO knows in private and nobody says out loud. Henry Ford figured this out in 1914. He paid his workers five dollars a day when the going rate was two, not out of virtue but because he needed customers, and his workers were the customers. You cannot sell cars to people who cannot afford them. AI breaks that deal. Each company that cuts its workforce also cuts its customer base, because those workers were buying somebody’s product. Do it across every industry at once and the market runs out of buyers.

Your tax point is the one that closes the trap. The workers were also the taxpayers. Replace them with AI and the income tax base collapses. The government has to tax the corporations more to make up for the hole, which eats the profits that were the whole point of cutting the workers in the first place. The loop folds in on itself, and the efficiency gains that were supposed to pay for the transition get spent on the tax and demand mess it creates.

---

Miles

---

So that is four negative loops running against each other and reinforcing each other. But I meant what I said about the positive. The handmade and the local is where I think a lot of people are going to want to go, and I think the same AI that is causing the problem is going to make it possible for them to get there.

---

Claude

---

That is the piece that makes your read different from the doom coverage, and I think you are on to it. When everything is made by AI at scale, the scarcity flips. What was premium becomes commodity. What was commodity becomes premium. A loaf of bread from a bakery with a different crumb every time. A restaurant where the chef actually cares. A chair made by one person. A blog written by somebody who is actually thinking. Those things will be worth more, not less, in a world of cheap AI output.

And the same AI that is eating the corporate middle is the tool that lets the local bakery reach customers without a marketing team. It lets the chef run the books without an accountant. It lets the craftsman sell nationally without a storefront. The machine that is hollowing out the corporate middle is also helping the independent base. That is not a feeling. It is structural.

So the question that closes this post and opens the next one is the one you already asked. Where is the new new job. The honest partial answer is that it may not be a job in the old sense. It may be a small shop, a blog, a podcast, a practice, a kitchen, a workshop. The old ladder from worker to middle manager to senior leader is broken. A different shape is being drawn, and it is not a ladder. It is a pyramid with a wide base of independent work. That is where we go next.

---

Sources & Notes

1. Northern Trust Asset Management, economic commentary on AI as a disinflationary force, 2026.

2. Economic Policy Institute, “The Productivity Pay Gap,” 2024 update. Real hourly compensation for the bottom half of American workers was essentially flat from 1979 to 2000, while productivity rose roughly 40 percent.

3. Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Public Law 99-603. Signed by Ronald Reagan, legalized approximately three million undocumented workers, endorsed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and major employer associations.

4. Goldman Sachs Research, “The Potentially Large Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Economic Growth,” 2023 and 2024 updates. Estimates significant task-level exposure to AI across the U.S. economy, with wide ranges depending on occupation.

5. Henry Ford, “My Life and Work,” 1922. Ford’s five dollar day was introduced in January 1914 and was explicitly framed as both a labor stabilization and a demand creation measure.